Congressional Statements
Rep. Ackerman Calls for 'Real Action'
Against Nations Promoting Terrorism in South Asia
Press Release
July 12, 2000
Congressman Gary L. Ackerman (D-N.Y.), Cochairman of the Congressional
Caucus on India and Indian Americans, today warned that if South Asia
faced the possibility of a nuclear conflagration, the real culprits were
those powers that cavalierly propagate and proliferate terrorism.
"In South Asia today, the real and immediate threat to regional
and global peace is state-sponsored cross-border terrorism. India, a longtime
victim of cross-border terrorism, is bound to lose its patience and perhaps
abandon its policy of restraint. Continued acts of terrorism against New
Delhi from across its western border could well trigger a tit-for-tat
and hot-pursuit response, which, in turn, can snowball into a major conflict.
Therefore, Mr. Chairman, if the region faces the possibility of a nuclear
conflagration, the real culprits are those powers that cavalierly propagate
and proliferate terrorism," Rep. Ackerman told a House International
Relations Committee hearing.
In a statement submitted for the record at a hearing on terrorism in
South Asia by the House International Relations Committee, the New York
Lawmaker said: "In South Asia today, the two crucibles of global
terrorism are Pakistan and its vassal state, Afghanistan. It's from these
two nations that fanatic forces of fundamentalist faith are spreading
wanton mayhem and murder not only against India, a bastion of democracy,
but also against Western democracies, values and interests.
"These forces of chaos, who make no distinction between civilian
and military targets, cannot thrive and function in both Pakistan and
Afghanistan without the cooperation and tacit blessings of the authoritarian
regimes that have usurped power in Islamabad and Kabul."
Rep. Ackerman, a leading member of the Committee who has visited India
nine times, asserted: "The repressive Taliban regime in Kabul and
the military dictatorship in Islamabad repeatedly deny playing any role
in promoting terrorism. The Pakistani junta's leader, Gen. Pervez Musharaff,
has even tried to ingeniously redefine the meaning of terrorism by saying
that 'jihad,' or Holy War, was not terrorism. But the international community
knows better. And it won't be hoodwinked. It knows that these assertions
are lies because the facts on the ground in both countries show that terrorism,
in its various forms, is nurtured and promoted with the sole purpose waging
an undeclared war."
"
It is pretty clear that the governments in Kabul and Islamabad are using
terrorist tactics, employing terrorist groups or exploiting terrorist
incidents as a means of surrogate warfare. These governments view terrorism
as a useful asset --- as a cheap means of waging war. Unable to mount
a overt conventional military exercise, terrorism is seen as an attractive
alternative --- an equalizer. Pakistan, I believe, looks upon terrorism
as a political tool to frustrate India's aspirations of emerging as a
major and respected military, technological and economic power. It apparently
sees it as an equalizer to neutralize the numerical and technological
advantages of the Indian defense forces," Rep. Ackerman said.
He added: "In effect, for Pakistan, terrorism in various forms is
a paramilitary option, or a weapon if you will, to bleed the Indian defense
forces and keep them tied up with internal security operations. The ultimate
hope is that this would somehow induce an over-all weakening of New Delhi's
resolve and lead to the breakup of India. It is apparently the Pakistani
military's unstated calculation that such a devious policy could ultimately
erode the unity and integrity of India just as the bleeding of the Red
Army in Afghanistan contributed to the breakup of the Soviet Union."
The international community, Rep. Ackerman declared: "has a moral
responsibility to see through this diabolical game and realize that the
Kashmir issue can never be - and must never be - allowed to be resolved
by military means."
He said: "It should only be resolved by mutual dialogue between
India and Pakistan within the framework of the Shimla Accord of 1972.
The issue has to be resolved bilaterally, by the parties themselves. And
before the two sides can resume a meaningful dialogue, the junta in Pakistan
must initiate credible efforts to restore trust with the government and
people of India. It is imperative that we also insist that the junta in
Islamabad undertake verifiable steps to stop its proxy terror war against
New Delhi, especially in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. This means,
in effect, that terrorist organizations such as the Harkat ul-Mujaheddin
and Lashkar e-Toiba must be outlawed by Pakistan. This means that the
regime in Islamabad must shut down all the training camps and 'madrassas,'
or religious schools, that produce these terror outfits. This means that
Pakistan cannot be fully recognized among the world's decent nations until
it takes real and serious steps to halt its role in supporting the 'jihad'
against India over Kashmir."
The lawmaker added: "It's time for our Administration to turn up
the heat against Islamabad and Kabul to bring to a close the two nations'
continued abetment and promotion of terrorism. It's time for real action
- Some definitive action that will clearly send a message across to the
recalcitrant forces that control Pakistan's military that enough is enough;
That this is not the way a responsible nuclear power behaves endangering
international peace and security; And that if Pakistan does not change
its behavior, it must recognize that there will be severe consequences
for violating global peace and security."
Full text of the statement by Rep. Ackerman follows:
South Asia is a critical area for us in the United States. After President
Clinton's historic visit to the region in March of this year, a new and
positive approach toward the area is hopefully evolving in our nation's
policy circles that recognizes the changed realities and emerging opportunities
of the Indian subcontinent.
However, the peace and stability that we seek to promote in the region
is being endangered by the blazing fire of the phenomenon called terrorism.
In South Asia today, the real and immediate threat to regional and global
peace is state-sponsored cross-border terrorism. India, a longtime victim
of cross-border terrorism, is bound to lose its patience and perhaps abandon
its policy of restraint. Continued acts of terrorism against New Delhi
from across its western border could well trigger a tit-for-tat and hot-pursuit
response, which, in turn, can snowball into a major conflict. Therefore,
Mr. Chairman, if the region faces the possibility of a nuclear conflagration,
the real culprits are those powers that cavalierly propagate and proliferate
terrorism.
In South Asia today, the crucibles of global terrorism are Pakistan and
its vassal state, Afghanistan. It's from these two nations that fanatic
forces of fundamentalist faith are spreading wanton mayhem and murder
not only against India, a bastion of democracy, but also against Western
democracies, values and interests.
These forces of chaos, who make no distinction between civilian and military
targets, cannot thrive and function in both Pakistan and Afghanistan without
the cooperation and tacit blessings of the authoritarian regimes that
have usurped power in Islamabad and Kabul.
The repressive Taliban regime in Kabul and the military dictatorship
in Islamabad repeatedly deny playing any role in promoting terrorism.
The Pakistani junta's leader, Gen. Pervez Musharaff, has even tried to
ingeniously redefine the meaning of terrorism by saying that 'jihad,'
or Holy War, was not terrorism. But the international community knows
better. And it won't be hoodwinked. It knows that these assertions are
lies because the facts on the ground in both countries show that terrorism,
in its various forms, is nurtured and promoted with the sole purpose waging
an undeclared war.
It is pretty clear that the governments in Kabul and Islamabad are using
terrorist tactics, employing terrorist groups or exploiting terrorist
incidents as a means of surrogate warfare. These governments view terrorism
as a useful asset --- as a cheap means of waging war. Unable to mount
a overt conventional military exercise, terrorism is seen as an attractive
alternative --- an equalizer. Pakistan, I believe, looks upon terrorism
as a political tool to frustrate India's aspirations of emerging as a
major and respected military, technological and economic power. It apparently
sees it as an equalizer to neutralize the numerical and technological
advantages of the Indian defense forces.
In effect, for Pakistan, terrorism in various forms is a paramilitary
option, or a weapon if you will, to bleed the Indian defense forces and
keep them tied up with internal security operations. The ultimate hope
is that this would somehow induce an over-all weakening of New Delhi's
resolve and lead to the breakup of India. It is apparently the Pakistani
military's unstated calculation that such a devious policy could ultimately
erode the unity and integrity of India just as the bleeding of the Red
Army in Afghanistan contributed to the breakup of the Soviet Union.
The international community has a moral responsibility to see through
this diabolical game and realize that the Kashmir issue can never be -
and must never be - allowed to be resolved by military means. It should
only be resolved by mutual dialogue between India and Pakistan within
the framework of the Shimla Accord of 1972. The issue has to be resolved
bilaterally, by the parties themselves.
And before the two sides can resume a meaningful dialogue, the junta
in Pakistan must initiate credible efforts to restore trust with the government
and people of India. It is imperative that we also insist that the junta
in Islamabad undertake verifiable steps to stop its proxy terror war against
New Delhi, especially in the Indian state of Jammu and Kashmir. This means,
in effect, that terrorist organizations such as the Harkat ul-Mujaheddin
and Lashkar e-Toiba must be outlawed by Pakistan. This means that the
regime in Islamabad must shut down all the training camps and 'madrasas,'
or religious schools, that produce these terror outfits. This means that
Pakistan cannot be fully recognized among the world's decent nations until
it takes real and serious steps to halt its role in supporting the 'jihad'
against India over Kashmir.
Pakistan must take back the doormat that says: "Terrorists Welcome."
Repeated assertions by officials from Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence
agency that they have less knowledge or control over these groups than
they would like, is neither sufficient nor acceptable, nor plausible.
Kashmir is a victim of cross-border terrorism --- pure and simple. In
Kashmir, the elected government is under continuous assault from secessionist
terrorists who are responsible for numerous serious abuses, including
extrajudicial executions, torture, kidnaping, and extortion. Mr. Chairman,
the fountainhead of human rights violations in Kashmir is state-sponsored
terrorism from across the border.
The peace-loving people of Jammu and Kashmir, Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs
alike, are victims of terrorism for the last several years. It's the terror
and unbridled violence let loose by the so-called Mujahiddin members -
many of them from overseas - from across the border that is the real cause
for human rights violations in Kashmir.
The real violators of human rights in Kashmir are the numerous terrorist
outfits owing allegiance to fundamentalist religious groups. It's religious
fanatics belonging to such groups as the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen and Lashkar
e-Toiba, recruited, trained and unleashed by Osama Bin Laden and his terror
network who are fanning the flames of human rights violations in Kashmir.
It these terror groups and training camps that we have to target - and
not democratic India - as violators of human rights. Mr. Chairman, acts
of terror have no place in a civilized world. The U.S. and India, as the
torch bearers of democratic values, have a moral duty to firmly confront
and combat this menace to international peace and put an end to cross-border
terrorism and acts of religious hate and bigotry. The establishment of
the U.S.-India Joint Working Group on Terrorism is one of most promising
developments in the relations between India and the U.S. Both the U.S.
and India must evolve a common strategy to roll back and stop this global
problem.
Undiluted resolve and clear-headed realism are essential ingredients
in facing up to the problem posed by international terrorism. Those who
abet and sponsor terrorism and allow their territory to be breeding grounds
for terrorism must be put on notice. They must be told in no uncertain
terms that unless they put an end to cross-border terrorism, they will
be put on the List of Nations that Promote Terrorism.
It's time for our Administration to turn up the heat against Islamabad
and Kabul to bring to a close the two nations' continued abetment and
promotion of terrorism. It's time for real action - Some definitive action
that will clearly send a message across to the recalcitrant forces that
control Pakistan's military that enough is enough; That this is not the
way a responsible nuclear power behaves endangering international peace
and security; And that if Pakistan does not change its behavior, it must
recognize that there will be severe consequences for violating global
peace and security.
If we in the U.S. indeed want to prevent nuclear brinkmanship in South
Asia, and also accomplish our stated goals of nuclear non-proliferation,
we must first pay urgent attention to the proliferation and propagation
of terrorism in the area. We have to take firm and decisive steps against
nations that engage in it. We have to demonstrate to both Pakistan and
its surrogate, Afghanistan, that terrorism does not pay.
Mr. Chairman, we in Congress should send a clear and unambiguous message
that, besides the terrorist outfits themselves, those nations that provide
sanctuary to terrorist organizations or assist them with technical, financial,
political or any other support will also be held accountable.
|